“The case of Heinrich”. From the history of the satirical press, censorship and trials in the Russian provinces during the first revolution of 1905–1907. Part 2. Administrative and judicial prosecution against K.E. Heinrich, the publisher of the “Karandash” magazine

Using the example of the publication history of the “Karandash” magazine in the Saratov province (1906), the article considers the historical circumstances of the functioning of the satirical press in the administrative and legal space of the Russian province during the period of the first revolution. It analyzes the structure and content features of the satirical magazine, the publication of which was subordinated to the tasks of radical political agitation. By using the newly identified, previously unpublished archival documents from three collections of the State Archives of the Saratov region, it also reconstructs the vicissitudes of the “Heinrich case” (the trials that took place in 1907–1909 against K.E. Heinrich, the publisher of the “Karandash” magazine).
The text of the article includes a commented publication of the archival documents’ fragments (the official correspondence of the press inspector, the prosecutor of the Saratov Judicial Chamber, of the Saratov governor; the judicial procedural materials of the Saratov Judicial Chamber). The materials from the “Heinrich case” show the characteristic phenomena and the processes in the Russian society and the government institutions of the early 20^th century: the clash of different systems of political and legal values; inconsistency in actions between the government agencies, the censorship and the judicial system; a combination of lenient and acquittal court sentences with harsh administrative penalties; the general ineffectiveness of the administrative and legal measures against radical political agitation in the country.

1. Аgapov, V.L. (2023), “The last censors. Vladivostok Inspectorate for the Press in 1906–1917], History and Archives, no. 4, pp. 12–35.

2. Lepilkina, O.I. (2008), “Provincial satirical press in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century”, Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 12, pp. 85–91.

3. Patrusheva, N.G. (2016), “Censorship institutions of the Russian Empire and the system of punitive censorship at the beginning of the 20th century”, Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo instituta kul’tury, vol. 213, pp. 79–84.

4. Privalov, V.D. (2019), Satiricheskaya pechat’ pervoi russkoi revolyutsii (1905–1908): po periodicheskim izdaniyam Peterburga [Satirical press of the First Russian Revolution (1905–1908) (based on the St. Petersburg periodicals], Saint Petersburg, Russia.

5. Sysoev, P.S. and Samarenko, V.P. (1979), “K.Eh. Heinrich – a tireless fighter against tsarist autocracy”, in Sokolov, S.A., ed., Povolzhskii krai [Volga region], vol. 6, pp. 154–167.

6. Varfolomeev, Yu.V. (2015), «Serebryanyi vek» russkoi advokatury. Chast’ 2: «Molodaya advokatura» na politicheskikh protsessakh v Rossii (konets XIX – nachalo XX v.) [The Silver Age of the Russian lawyers. Part 2. “The young lawyers” in the political trials in Russia (the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th centuries)], Saratov, Russia.