The reception of the theory of the Unified State Archival Fund
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-6541-2019-2-23-33
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the establishment of a network of state archives in Russia. The author states that one of the achievements of the Russian archivists from the early 20th century is at the same time the greatest theoretical achievement of the world archival science in the last century.
The theory of Unified State Archival Fund appears in response to the new tasks of historical archives around the world in respect of the immense amount of emerging documents, their extreme diversity in type, mode of creation and use, the rapid development of social sciences. The comprehensive coverage of historically valuable documentation for its preservation for future generations (regardless of the type, author, creator and owner of the information, the technique of fixing and using it) appears to be the most easily achievable in Soviet Russia and in the countries similar to her in terms of organization, but it is a task for all other countries.
The article mentions statements about the positives of overall and integrate centralization of the archives, made by many prominent representatives of world archival theory and practice. Throughout the 20th Century, there actually was an exchange of ideas and positive practices in this respect, regardless of the economic and political differences between countries. Particularly impressive are the successes of the archivists in Canada, where the quest is for archives that are even been called «total” but which, unfortunately, forgetting their predecessors are presented as a theoretical novelty.
About the Author
Stefka H. PetkovaBulgaria
Dr. of Sci. (History), professor
Bulgaria, Sofia 1784, Boulevard Tsarigradskoe highway
References
1. Cook T. Archives in the post-custodial World: Interaction of archival Theory and Practice since the publication of the Duch manual in 1898. Archivum. Vol. 43: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Archives, Beijing, 2–7 September 1996. München, 1997. P. 191–214.
2. Duchein M. Le respect du fonds en archivistique. Principes théoriques et problèmes pratiques. Gazette des archives. 1977;97:71-96.
3. Петковa С. Съпротивата срещу Указ 515 – причини и последствия (Щрихи към историята на българските архиви 2). Архивен преглед. 2011;2:34-157.
4. Петрова Е., Петкова С. Михаил Стойков Алексиев и приносът му за архивното дело в България (По повод на 110-та годишнина от рождението му) // Архивен преглед. 2014. Кн. 1. С. 7–66.
5. Peterson TH. Machine-readable records asarchival Materials. Archivum. Vol. 35: Actesdu 11e Congrès international des Archives (Paris, 22–26 août 1988). Paris, 1989. Р. 83–8.
6. Kecskemeti Ch., Körmendy L. Les écrits s’envolent: la problématique de la conservation des archives papier et numériques. Lausanne: Fabre, 2014. 207 р.
7. Müller S., Feith J. A., Fruin R. Ръководство за класиране и описание на архивите: Превод от френски. София: Печатница «Надежда» на Р. Шимонов, 1912. 190 с.
8. Jenkinson H. A Manual of Archives Administration. London, 1922. 284 p.
9. Favier J. Les Archives et leur publique: le cas de la France. V : Aus der Arbeit der Archive. Festschriftfür Hans Booms. Boppardam a/Rhein, 1989. P. 75–82.
10. René-Bazin P. La création et la collecte des nouvelles archives. Archivum. Vol. 35 : Actes du 11e Congrès international des Archives, Paris, 22–26 août 1988. Paris, 1989. P. 39–41.
11. Nougaret Ch. L’impact des technologies de l’information sur les archives et le travail de l’archiviste. Archivum. Vol. 43 : Actes du 13e Congrès international des Archives, Pékin, 2–7 septembre 1996. München, 1997. P. 283–309.
12. Bautier R-H. Les archives des collectivités locales. V : Actes de la Onzième et Douzième Conférences internationales des Archives. Bucarest, 1969, Jérusalem, 1970. Paris: Conseil International des archives, [1972]. 171 p.
13. Богданов И. Архивология. София: Нов български университет, 2014. 753 с.
14. Rhoads J. Archival cooperation between the United States and the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics. V: Aus der Arbeit der Archive. Festschrift für Hans Booms. Boppardam a/Rhein, 1989. P. 36–43.
15. Alexiev M. Facilités de l’accès aux documents en Bulgarie. Archivum. 1968. Vol. 18. Р. 80–82.
16. Elpat’evskii A.V. Borrowing or mutual influence (Russian and Western European archival science in 1920-1930) //Herald of the archivist. 1997. №5 (41). P. 34–40.
Review
For citations:
Petkova S.H. The reception of the theory of the Unified State Archival Fund. History and Archives. 2019;(2):23-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-6541-2019-2-23-33