Preview

History and Archives

Advanced search

Pride and prejudice and “okhranka”. Political police in contemporary Russian historiography

Abstract

The article analyzes ideological assessments of the place for political police in the system of public relations and state institutions in the Russian Empire of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as well as the incorrect use of the term “provocation” as a symptom pointing to an uncritical selection of sources in the current historiography. The use of this term is analyzed through the example of the gendarme lieutenant colonel A.D. Zavaritsky’s case, presented in the article of DA. Butyrin, as well as the IP. Kalyayev’s case in the works by RS. Zakirov. Special attention is paid to the specific understanding of the practice of police provocation by V.F. Dzhunkovskii the Independent Corps of Gendarmes commander and the reflection of that concept in the article by DA. Gutnov. The article also presents other consequences of uncritical analysis of the sources of the epoch, such as: unconfirmed statements about the systematic physical coercion practiced by gendarmerie officers on suspects during interrogations, on the one hand, and idealization of the career of gendarme memoirists , on the other. The article make the assumption of the collective portrait of the ultimate beneficiary of the unjustified use of the term “provocation” as applied to the practices of Russian special services in the early 20th century, as well as it names the reasons for the spread of this phenomenon today.

 

About the Author

Anna M. Lavryonova
State Archive of the Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Federation
postgraduate student


References

1. Butyrin Da. Gendarmes and deputies. “The case of Lieutenant Colonel Zavaritsky” in the State Duma and the Vladivostok Fortress (1909). The New Historical Bulletin. 2016;4:57-79. (In Russ.)

2. Russian State archive. Fond 110.

3. Russian State archive. Fond 102.

4. The total personnel of directorates and officials of the Separate corps of gendarmes on October 10, 1904 Sankt-Reterburg, 1904. (In Russ.)

5. Vecher. 1908. Nov. 30. (In Russ.)

6. Soloviev Ka. The Duma monarchy. Public dialogue on the background of reforms. Rodina. 2006;12:10-13. (In Russ.)

7. Peregudova ZI. Political investigation in Russia (1880–1917). 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ.; 2013. 519 p. (In Russ.)

8. Zakirov RS. Visit of Grand Duchess Elizabeth Feodorovna to prison to I.P. Kaliayev as a provocation of the Police Department. Sholokhov Moscow State University for the Humanities Bulletin. History and Political Series. 2012;4:20-36. (In Russ.)

9. Spiridovich aI. Notes of a gendarme. Reprint. Reproduction ed. 1930. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ.; 1991. 263 p. (In Russ.)

10. Sof’in DM. Grand Duke Sergei aleksandrovich. The way of the Russian Conservative. Moscow, 2016. (In Russ.)

11. Gutnov Da. From the history of the Russian political investigation: V.F. Dzhunkovsky and the struggle “from above” against the practice of police provocation in 1913–1915. RUDN Journal of Russian History. 2012;2:36-45. (In Russ.)

12. Martynov aP. My service in the Separate Corps of Gendarmes. V: “Okhranka”: Memories of the top executives of political investigation. In 2 vols. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2004. Vol. 1. p. 27-408.

13. Makhnovets VP. How to behave during interrogations. Geneva: Soyuz russkikh sotsial-demokratov Publ.; 1900. 43 p. (In Russ.)

14. Zenzinov VM. The Bygones. New-York: Izd-vo im. Chekhova Publ.; 1953. 414 p. (In Russ.)

15. Zavarzin PP. Gendarmes and revolutionaries. V: “Okhranka”: Memories of the top executives of political investigation. In 2 vols. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2004. Vol. 2. p. 6-138. (In Russ.)

16. Lukomskii aS. Essays from my life. Memories. Volkov S., preface, comp., comments. Moscow: airis-press Publ.; 2012. 752 p. (In Russ.)

17. Kvasov ON. Revolutionary terrorism in the Central Chernozem (Black Earth) region at the beginning of the 20th century (1901–1911). Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publ.; 2005. 223 p. (In Russ.)

18. Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire. Third Collection. In 33 vols. Sankt-Reterburg, 1885. Vol. 1. № 350. (In Russ.)

19. Polyakov aM. Notes of a gendarme officer. The gendarmes of Russia (Polit. investigation in Russia. 15th – 20th centuries. Recent research). Sankt-Reterburg: Neva Publ.; 2002. p. 486-487. (In Russ.)

20. Vasil’ev aT. Security. Russian secret police. V: “Okhranka”: Memories of the top executives of political investigation. In 2 vols. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2004. Vol. 2. p. 345-513. (In Russ.)

21. Brodnikova MN. On the methods of the Russian Empire political police work with secret agents in the early twentieth century. Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2016;2:37-43. (In Russ.)

22. Lavryonova aM. a.P. Martynov’s Service in Saratov Security Department (about the Crisis of Identity in the Gendarme Сommunity). The New Historical Bulletin. 2015;1:99-116. (In Russ.)

23. Shcherbakova EI., pref., comp., comm. Political police of the Russian Empire between the reforms. From V.K. Pleve to V.F. Dzhunkovsky. a collection of documents. Moscow; Sankt-Reterburg: aIRO-XXI; aleteiya Publ.; 2014. 351 p. (In Russ.)

24. Shchegoleva PE., ed. The Fall of the Czar regime. The verbatim records of interrogations and testimony given in 1917 in the Emergency Investigation Commission of the Provisional Government. Leningrad: Gos. izd-vo Publ.; 1925. Vol. 3. 506 p. (In Russ.)

25. Stolypin Pa. We need Great Russia ... Complete Coll. of speches in the State Duma and State Council, 1906–1911. Fel’shtinskii YuG., comp., comm. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya Publ.; 1991. 411 p. (In Russ.)

26. Ovchenko YuF. Moscow secret police at the turn of the century. 1880–1904 years Moscow: INSOFT Publ.; 2010. 232 p. (In Russ.)

27. Ovchenko YuF. The security of the empire. (Political investigaion– a mean of ensuring the security of the Russian autocracy, 1880-1917). Moscow: Tehinform Publ.; 2012. 370 p. (In Russ.)

28. Ovchenko YuF. Provocation in the service of the secret police. The New Historical Bulletin. 2003;1:28-45. (In Russ.)

29. Serednev Va. The procedural status of intelligence and surveillance operations in criminal legal proceedings (ideological aspect). Zhurnal nauchnykh publikatsii aspirantov i doktorantov. 2011;1:30-40. (In Russ.)

30. Zavarzin PP. The work of the secret police. V: “Okhranka”: Memories of the top executives of political investigation. In 2 vols. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2004. Vol. 1. p. 410–493. (In Russ.)

31. Butyrin Da. Lieutenant-Colonel anatolii Zavaritskii and the Vladivostok Uprising of 1907. The New Historica Bulletin. 2018;1:120-49. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Lavryonova A.M. Pride and prejudice and “okhranka”. Political police in contemporary Russian historiography. History and Archives. 2019;(1):30-47. (In Russ.)

Views: 602


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-6541 (Print)