Memoirs of political and state figures of contemporary Russia as a factor in the formation of historical narratives
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-6541-2026-8-2-122-138
Abstract
The history of modern Russia is documented by many sources, among which is a large complex that includes the memoirs of political and state figures of the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation. In modern Russian historiography, memoirs are recognized as a significant source, although their role in shaping the historical narrative requires additional study. They are important for reconstructing events, verifying interpretations, and developing new research directions. Memoirs influence the collective memory and serve as a political argument in assessing certain events in Russian history. However, their use in historical research is associated with a number of problems, including political bias and commercial interest of the authors and publishers. Since the end of the twentieth century, the Soviet Union and then Russia have experienced revolutionary upheavals – the collapse of a huge union state and the transition to a new development paradigm. The collisions of those events have given rise to a unique phenomenon of our time – the desire of politicians and statesmen to leave their reminiscences and make them public. The scale of the publication of the memoirs of the presidents of the USSR and Russia, their assistants and advisers, the military figures and diplomats raises the issue of a comprehensive approach to the study of these unique historical testimonies not only as the units of individual memory, but also as mass historical sources.
About the Author
N. V. EliseevaRussian Federation
Natalia V. Eliseeva, Cand. of Sci. (History), professor
6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, 125047
References
1. Arkhipova, T.G. (2020), “The informative value of memoir sources for studying the history of Russian statehood”, in Dokumental’noe nasledie i istoricheskaya nauka: Materialy Ural’skogo istoriko-arkhivnogo foruma, posvyashchennogo 50-letiyu istoriko-arkhivnoi spetsial’nosti v Ural’skom universitete (Ekaterinburg, 11–12 sentyabrya 2020 g.) [Documentary heritage and historical science: Proceedings of the Ural Historical and Archival Forum dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the historical and archival specialty at Ural University, Ekaterinburg (September 11–12, 2020)], Ural’skii federal’nyi un-t im. pervogo Prezidenta Rossii B.N. El’tsina, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
2. Bezborodov, А.B. and Eliseevа, N.V. (2021), Sovetskii Soyuz i Rossiiskaya Federatsiya: 1985–2018 gg.: Ocherki istorii: Kniga 1: Sovetskii Soyuz v kontse KHKH stoletiya: vyzovy globalizatsii [In the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation: 1985 2018: Essays on history. Book 1. The Soviet Union at the end of the 20th century: challenges of globalization], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
3. Bezborodov, A.B. and Eliseeva, N.V. (2025), Sovetskii Soyuzi Rossiiskaya Federatsiya: 1985–2018 gg.: Ocherki istorii: Kniga 2: Rossiiskaya Federatsiya:1990-e gg. [The Soviet Union and the Russian Federation: 1985–2018: Essays on history. Book 2: The Russian Federation: The 1990s], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
4. Garskova, I.M. and Simonzhenkova, E.M. (2019), “On the formalized methodology of analyzing memoir source complexes”, Istoricheskaya informatika, no. 1, pp. 169–188.
5. Eliseeva, N.V. (2019), “Memoirs of modern Russian history: problems of analysis and interpretation”, in Istoriya sovremennosti: Informatsionnye resursy, metody i issledovatel’skie praktiki v Rossii i za rubezhom: doklady Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Moskva, 28–29 noyabrya 2019 g.) [History of modern times. Information resources, methods, and research practices in Russia and abroad. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, November 28–29, 2019)], Moscow, Russia.
6. Khorkhordina, T.I. (2024), Arkhivy lichnogo proiskhozhdeniya v Rossii [Archives of personal origin in Russia], Ves’ mir, Moscow, Russia.
7. Kovalchenko, I.D. (1987), Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Methods of historical research], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
8. Kolesnikova, L.A. (2005), Istoriko-revolyutsionnaya memuaristika (1917–1935 gg.) kak massovyi istochnik po istorii russkikh revolyutsii (metodika kolichestvennogo analiza) [Historical and revolutionary memoirs (1917–1935) as a mass source on the history of the Russian revolutions (Methods of quantitative analysis)], D.Sc. Thesis (History), Moscow, Russia.
9. Litvak, B.G. (1979), Ocherki istochnikovedeniya massovoi dokumentatsii [Essays on the source studies of mass documentation], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
10. Sokolov, A.K., ed. (2004), Istochnikovedenie noveishei istorii Rossii: teoriya, metodologiya i praktika [Source studies of modern Russian history: theory, methodology, and practice], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Eliseeva N.V. Memoirs of political and state figures of contemporary Russia as a factor in the formation of historical narratives. History and Archives. 2026;8(2):122-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-6541-2026-8-2-122-138
JATS XML





















