“It is hard to die with the undeserved ‘counter-revolutionary’ stigma”. The reflection of repressions in the complaints of prisoners and their relatives about retrial, 1938–1939
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-6541-2021-4-30-45
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the texts of the complaints of prisoners and their relatives about an unfair conviction during the NKVD “kulak” operation. They are stored in the investigative cases of the repressed Muscovites in the State Archives of the Russian Federation. The complaints have a three-part structure with the “true” (according to the complainants) motives of conviction (slander, actions of the investigator), arrest reasons and their relationship with each other, and the arguments proving human innocence. The author analyses the differences in the understanding of the reasons of repressions in the texts of the prisoners and their relatives. The convicts realized a clear connection between the social origin and the fact of arrest, their relatives did not consider that reason to be significant and believed that labor merits were more important than the origin. Their petitions are more biographical, the convicts themselves paid considerable attention to the explanation of each official charge. The relatives more often believed in the “mistakes” of the NKVD while conducting arrests, the prisoners explained the repression as a revenge of the colleagues or neighbors. The mass terror was only intuitively recognized by the complainants; they transferred the responsibility for it onto ordinary citizens – the “snitches” and investigators who fabricated the cases.
Keywords
About the Author
E. M. Mishina
The charity foundation “Give the Hand”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina M. Mishina, Cand. of Sci. (History)
bldg. 3, bld. 11, Mokhovaya St., Moscow 125009
References
1. Bykova, S. (2011), “ ‘Time-Thief’. The idea of the inhabitants of the Ural region about the scope and causes of terror in the 1930s”, in Istoriia stalinizma: repressirovannaia rossiiskaia provintsiia: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Smolensk, 9–11 oktiabria 2009 g. [History of Stalinism. A repressed Russian province. Materials of the international scientific conference. Smolensk, October 9–11, 2009], Moscow, Russia, 2011, pp. 400–407.
2. Gridunova, I. (2009), “The role of the prosecutor’s office in the rehabilitation activities of 1939-1941 on the materials of the Altai and Novosibirsk Region”, in Stalinizm v sovetskoi provintsii: 1937–1938 gg. Massovaia operatsiia na osnove prikaza № 00447 [Stalinism in the Soviet province. 1937–1938. Mass operation based on order No. 00447], ROSSPEN, Fond “Prezidentskii tsentr B.N. El’tsina”, Moscow, Russia, pp. 647–662.
3. Devis S. (2011), Mnenie naroda v stalinskoi Rossii: Terror, propaganda i inakomyslie, 1934–1941 [Popular opinion in Stalin’s Russia. Terror, propaganda and dissent, 1934–1941], ROSSPEN, Fond “Prezidentskii tsentr B.N. El’tsina”, Moscow, Russia.
4. Kodan, S. (2017), “Sources of personal origin in the study of the history of the Soviet state and law. Theoretical and methodological foundations of research” [Online], available at: http://www.universum-juris.org/?q=ru/node/32# (Accessed 2 Feb 2021).
5. Surzhikova, N. (2014), “Ego-documents. An intellectual fashion or a conscious need? (Instead of having a preface)”, in Istoriia v ego-dokumentakh: Issledovaniya i istochniki [History in ego-documents. Research and sources], AsPUr, Ekaterinburg, Russia, pp. 6–13.
6. Troitskii, Yu. (2014), “Analytics of ego-documents: an instrumental resource of a historian”, in Istoriia v ego-dokumentakh: Issledovaniya i istochniki [History in ego-documents. Research and sources], AsPUr, Ekaterinburg, Russia, pp. 14–31.
7. Uimanov, V. (2012), “Was there a ‘Beria thaw’ in the USSR? (On the issue of rehabilitation of repression victims)”, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 358, pp. 39–45.
8. Fitzpatrick, Sh. (2008), Sotsial’naya istoriya Sovetskoy Rossii v 30-ye gody: gorod [The social history of Soviet Russia in the 30s. A city], ROSSPEN, Fond “Prezidentskii tsentr B.N. El’tsina”, Moscow, Russia.
9. Fitzpatrick, Sh. (2011), Sryvaite maski! Identichnost’ i samozvanstvo v Rossii XX veka [Tear off the masks! Identity and imposture in 20th century Russia], ROSSPEN, Fond “Prezidentskii tsentr B.N. El’tsina”, Moscow, Russia.
10. Валуев 2012 – Валуев Д.В. Лишенцы в системе социальных отношений, 1918– 1936 гг.: на материалах Смоленской губернии и Западной области. Смоленск, 2012. 155 c.
11. Килин 2018 – Килин А.П. Автобиографические сведения в структуре личного дела гражданина, возбудившего ходатайство о восстановлении в избирательных правах, лишенных за занятие торговлей // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2018. № 433. С. 70–77.
12. Москаленская 2013 – Москаленская Д.Н. Тактики поведения священнои церковнослужителей-«лишенцев» Западной Сибири в борьбе за восстановление в правах: середина 1920 – середина 1930-х годов // Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: История, филология. 2013. Т. 12, вып. 8. С. 134–138.
13. Разгон 2009 – Разгон В.Н. Репрессии против бывших «кулаков» в Алтайском крае в 1937–1938 г. // Сталинизм в советской провинции: 1937–1938: Массовые операции на основе приказа № 00447. М., 2009. С. 83–102.
Review
For citations:
Mishina E.M. “It is hard to die with the undeserved ‘counter-revolutionary’ stigma”. The reflection of repressions in the complaints of prisoners and their relatives about retrial, 1938–1939. History and Archives. 2021;(4):30-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-6541-2021-4-30-45
Views:
755
Email this article 